Expert Scope

877.603.3139
Home Get Listed Search Experts Litigation Support Articles News Resources Contact
 

ExpertScope: Chiropractic expert witnesses testify

In June 2007, the Record reported on a suit filed by a woman who sought a neck adjustment then turned and sued the chiropractor for “unwanted, intrusive contact.” Now, the case has gone to trial.

Five weeks after undergoing spinal surgery, LaDonna Burge pleaded with her chiropractor, who also happened to be her boss, to perform an adjustment on her ailing neck and back, according to attorney opening statements heard on April 7.

Dr. Scott Kerr, owner of the Community Chiropractic Center, and his colleague requested that Burge obtain permission from her surgeon. When the surgeon gave her the green light, Kerr consented to the adjustment and Burge submitted to two sessions in early December 2006.

A few months later, Burge, the receptionist for Community Chiropractic, filed a lawsuit against Kerr and his business in Jefferson County, claiming the adjustments were performed “against her will” and had worsened her already traumatized neck.

During opening statements, plaintiff’s attorney Mike Pierce said the defendants failed to exercise good judgment by consenting to Burge’s requested adjustment and “therefore (are) negligent.”

Pierce added that his expert witness will testify a prudent chiropractor would have waited a year before performing an adjustment on a patient who recently underwent neck surgery.

Quattlebaum also said her expert witness will testify that a chiropractor will wait up to a year after surgery like Burge’s before giving an adjustment to ensure the vertebrae fusions are solid.

Court documents show Community Chiropractic Center professionals did X-ray Burge and determined the fusion was solid before the adjustment.

As far as both experts are concerned, Quattlebaum said the plaintiff’s expert “doesn’t really practice” chiropractic anymore and is going to school to become a nurse, while her expert is a professor at the Texas Chiropractic College in Pasadena.

According to court documents and testimony, Burge has altered and contradicted her testimony several times since the suit was filed, alleging the she was “tricked” into a second adjustment although testimony shows that she told her co-workers that the first session made her feel better and she would like another adjustment.

Burge’s attorney claims the adjustments “compounded her injury,” causing a painful bulged disk.

Conversely, Quattlebaum argues Burge’s alleged bulged disk pain may have resulted from her refusal to undergo physical rehabilitation, and the attorney also noted that Burge has a documented history of playing up her pain in order to obtain drugs from doctors.

“Chiropractic is a treatment for bulging disk” Quattlebaum said. “It does not cause them.”

Tags:

Leave a Reply

   

 

The contents of this website are copyright ©2010 by California Legal, LLC. All rights reserved.

Terms :: Privacy Policy :: Contact